European Tribune

Display:
the "6%" figure is "pre-Clinton" era. The 10% is not on the chart, but is figured from pre-Reagan CPI methodology.

Williams' numbers seem grotesque, but that is because we are the frogs being slowly boiled. Now the underlying issues have reached the geometric progression stage. Jerome brings up examples constantly.

Drew asked about the .75 interest rate drop in the last few months. It's a desperate attempt to keep the financial institutions working their Ponzi scheme - nothing more. It's another cycle of the virtual generation of money, and it, plus the 200 billion released by the Fed bank last month, are why M3 is jumping.

The problem with saying that removing the cap on SS contributions will lower the debt figure in short order is the political reality of actually doing that. It's true that one part of the solution to many financial issues in the U.S. is to squeeze the super-rich. Who's going to do it? Meantime, they don't know how to do anything except try to shill the system.

paul spencer

by paul spencer (spencerinthegorge AT yahoo DOT com) on Sun Nov 11th, 2007 at 03:24:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
from a previous comment. Reread Williams' predictions from December 2006. Tell me where he was wrong and by how much. My recollection from nearly a year ago was that Jerome, Williams, and very few others would have predicted these kinds of problems for 2007 - maybe Fleckenstein. I won't include myself, because I'm a Marxist, and I've known that we were headed here for many years.

paul spencer
by paul spencer (spencerinthegorge AT yahoo DOT com) on Sun Nov 11th, 2007 at 03:29:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series