Display:
So that's the difference. Thinking of it, I almost never go according to street names, prefer a map (memorised or in hand, mostly the former).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Nov 10th, 2007 at 05:53:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, in that case you're right: if the map has a high degree of symmetry all the points look the same and there's essentially only one place in the whole map. So, it's a little hard to go from "here" to "there" as it is hard to define what "here" and "there" mean.

A few observations. One is that, in Suburbia, all the freeways, freeway exits, service areas and town crossings look and feel very similar, almost interchangeable. This can be disconcerting. Someone called this "no-places".

Another is that this uniformity is actually by design and is part of the business model of restaurant chains such as McDonald's, or store chains and supermarkets. The idea is that if the shopping or eating experience is the same no matter where you are, it's supposed to be reassuring to the traveller, or the person who moves house frequently. It makes it easier by design to move about in search of work, or to travel. But it can be an impoverishing experience compared with what happens when one moves to a substantially different place. By contrast, every country in Europe, even different regions, have different look and feel of the construction, and different business chains with different brands and different procedures.

Finally, I once saw a lecture by lee Smolin where he attempted to develop this idea that in order to have individual points the view from each of them has to be sufficiently different (and so, that in a highly regular grid of points there is really only one point).

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Nov 10th, 2007 at 06:17:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series