European Tribune

Display:
Isn't this what EU Structural funds were supposed to be for - to alleviate the disadvantages of Peripheral regions?  The question of road versus rail is also relevant, although I would be interested in seeing what the relative economics of construction costs and capacities would be.

Making up with Serbia doesn't seem a likely immediate solution either, at least until the Kosovo and Montenengro situations are stabilised.  But it really is in Serbia's interest to make up with the EU ASAP.  Otherwise it will be bypassed by history as well as by the EU transportation network.

notes from no w here

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Sat Dec 1st, 2007 at 04:19:06 PM EST
The potential of more independence movements in Bosnia, Serbia, Kosovo, Macedonia might upset this reconciliation even more than it is now.

And really, when it comes to land, I don't think that even joining the EU will mean more to people.

by Upstate NY on Sat Dec 8th, 2007 at 02:04:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yea, something like this is exactly what EU structural funds are for. However, because Bulgaria and Romania only joined the EU recently, there hasn't been a chance for this to kick in to great effect.

But from the point of view of Greece I think they would have preferred that the EU had made a special concession much earlier to build a road through them once it was realised that Serbian isolationism effectively crippled Greece's ability to trade with the rest of the EU.

I wonder if Greece's turnaround on Turkey is to put pressure on the eU to get the eastern europe routes through R & B sorted out quickly.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sat Dec 8th, 2007 at 03:16:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series