Display:
Jerome, what you state here must be liberally interpreted in order to not smell like political correctness / tongue in cheek.

How come I have to repeat myself so often?

How often should I do this in order to make a point?
Or am I being gullible / naive and am I being tossed around by the real science guys or thereabouts?

Step by step:

  1. determine if you appreciate the human qualities in http://web.hec.ca/leadergraphies/ and http://www.big-picture.tv/. When in doubt: use as reference current headlines, Cheney, Guantanomo Bay, Josef Stalin, Hyjacking Catastrophe, The Corporation, Who killed the electric car, Edgar Hoover, Mao

  2. see what the people whose qualities you appreciate have in common / what distinguishes them from the reference group

  3. explore methods and tools having the potential to bring forth those qualities in yourself

  4. Blog your findings

Horses can be led to the water, but can't be made to drink.

Cheers,

Emil

by emilmoller (emil@beyondthewalls.eu) on Mon Dec 24th, 2007 at 04:00:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I failed. Is there any way you can enlighten me, or am I doomed to remain stupid?

More to the point - why should I be doing anything? You're the one trying to convince me of something. At least show me something to tempt me, insterad of just telling me how narrow-minded and boneheaded and stupid I am.


In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Dec 24th, 2007 at 05:46:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Jerome,

Stating on the outset that you've failed means you don't want to enter the trajectory proposed.

That's ok, but that does not mean that you can't; it's not your inability in the sense of insufficient qualities.

Stating that one can't while one doesn't want is what Sartre calls bad faith.

I'm not calling you the names indicated or any other. I try to make a case without any penalizing labels, since that is neither my style nor productive.

You as Jerome don't have to do anything. You as an intellectual have a moral obligation to use your qualities to relief suffering on this planet.

When confronted with fundamental issues as I tried to raise here, an intellectual should be curious in the sense of inquiring within and go out on a limb to get to the root of the matter.

Are you not tempted by the perspecetive to develop your Buddha, Jesus, Lao Tzu, Dalai Lama, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Mother Theresa, Albert Schweizer cs qualities?

Emil

by emilmoller (emil@beyondthewalls.eu) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 03:56:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
1) determine if you appreciate the human qualities in http://web.hec.ca/leadergraphies/ and http://www.big-picture.tv/. When in doubt: use as reference current headlines, Cheney, Guantanomo Bay, Josef Stalin, Hyjacking Catastrophe, The Corporation, Who killed the electric car, Edgar Hoover, Mao

  1. see what the people whose qualities you appreciate have in common / what distinguishes them from the reference group

  2. explore methods and tools having the potential to bring forth those qualities in yourself

  3. Blog your findings

Argumentum ad handwavium, in other words... Can we cut back on the logical fallacies, please? They're getting tiresome.

Horses [Sceptics] can be led to the water [kool-aid], but can't be made to drink.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Dec 25th, 2007 at 04:18:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series