As stated before, the main issue is: are we as a species able to shift our center of consciousness up. Become more compassionate, visionary, loving.
If we continue using the intellect-sec, we will remain stuck in -ever partial- perspectives and not be able to shift up [note: I'm a PhD researching 'Decision making processes in a transition towards a sustainable energy regime']. Consequence: involution, collapse. Alternative: abundant clean energy and other resources for all. And a platform to address other pressing issues.
Consequence: involution, collapse. Alternative: abundant clean energy and other resources for all. And a platform to address other pressing issues.
You overstudy every word to nitpick it to death, but you won´t even read a single link from emil. Shame for what ET wants to represent because it´s a huge waste of education to resort to THIS, or to ´not understanding´. Elitist puke. Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.
Emil has shown that under his talk of compassion and higher consciousness there is a reservoir of hatred for humanity. We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
All, as asked before: how many times should one / I repeat myself?
How much discipline re reading someone's postings, asking for clarifications, setting out from benefit of the doubt can be asked?
Why do all of the readers implicitly comply with Migeru's interpretation? These words would make quite a ripple irl in the social circles I live in.
Emil
No reply.
Now it's elimination of the lower orders of humanity that he's implying.
I'm not going to get emotional, but this is not elitist puke or other that I'm giving you, metavision. I have suffered enough in my life from religiously-minded people who always end up by:
If that's the best he can do, (on the positive side, because the negative is pointed out just above), then it's no good.
Sorry for the bold.
It's an image arising from studying patterns of men thinking they're free, thinking science will deliver solutions or whatever. Perhaps I'm blind to the happy ending that awaits us on the horizon, but my best knowledge and intuitions tell be otherwise. Call me to an ethically dominated stance.
What does one do after reading contemporary media and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse:_How_Societies_Choose_to_Fail_or_Succeed http://www.amazon.com/States-Denial-Knowing-Atrocities-Suffering/dp/0745623921 http://books.google.com/books?id=vP0dAAAAMAAJ&q=ISBN+0-8164-9358-8&dq=ISBN+0-8164-9358-8& ;ei=5wF0R4XwA4HGiQGQiuF2&pgis=1
Blog?
re 'unless the right spiritual path is taken': see my previous wonder re the suggestive tone implied here.
