Display:
I'm sorry but I'm not nitpicking. It's a legal issue, exclusive economic zone could be expanded according to the international law, and what you or I are thinking on this point is irrelevant.

Regarding North Pole accessibility - it WAS heavily iced at the point in time when the submersion has occurred, and thus projections on what might happen by 2012 are completely irrelevant and cannot diminish the technical feat that has been accomplished.

Yes, I could spend 5 hours on the Internet and find the ultimate source of the words you've cited. It doesn't really matter if they were repeated in a cozillion other "sources" - it's nothing but a herd instinct in action.

by Sargon on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 05:39:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
We may just have to agree to disagree on some of these points, but I do want to clarify one thing.  I never intended to downplay the "technical feat" of what the Russian explorers achieved.  It was a brave and skillful operation.  As to ice, you must remember that the melting made it possible to perform this daring exploration.  Ten years earlier when the ice was much thicker no one could have done this.

"My True Religion Is Kindness" -- The Dalai Lama
by JohnnyRook (johnnyrook1@gmail.com) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 08:25:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't claim to be a specialist in a history of Soviet subs surfacing around the Pole, so I don't really know when it was possible and when not.
by Sargon on Sun Dec 30th, 2007 at 06:26:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series