Brian Herbert had located some important notes on the sequel to Chapterhouse in a safety deposit box or two. The notes were extensive; what did Herbert-pere intend by the two old gardeners (Face Dancers?) at the end of the book? He must have left some extensive sketches, because "Hunters" has more of the scope of a Dune novel than the prequels done by the Herbert/Anderson team.
Still, Herbert-fils tends more to action and less to conversations. The elegant, twisty dialog that his father wrote is not something he can imitate. The book heads faster to the payoff than one would like, though here, the scope is so broad and the action so wide that this problem is less pronounced than in the prequel books. And the character development is not there either; we know Bellonda, who shows up in this book, Duncan, Murbella and Sheeana, so we fill in the blanks. But the new characters, interesting though they might be, are not fleshed out as well as one would like (at least, the protagonists; the villains are as always, easier to draw.) In particular, Doria looked interesting, and she was quite reminiscent of Dortujla (the punished Reverend Mother found on Buzzell in "Chapterhouse") but we don't get to find out much about her. Likewise, the Oracle of Time is very interesting but we really find out little about her characteristics. I realize the book was getting long long long, but still, some character development is important.
I started enjoying this book immensely, but by the end, I was pretty tired and not as hopeful as I was at the beginning. With good character development, these sequels would have been terrific, as the plot sketches were definitely of the Dune quality. But Brian Herbert's style is his own--it's a valid style but it is not a good match to his father's inimitable writing. But I have to say "Hunters" is probably by far Herbert/Anderson's best effort to date.
The best thing about Hunters is that towards the end I felt like immersing in the Dune universe, especially the scene with mysterious Oracle of Time:
Enjoy it, it's worthy read.
Not to derail your excellent Benazir diary or anything, but since you mentioned Dune, I thought I'd throw in a reference to a new book, The Science of Dune, that attempts to analyze the, um, science of Dune.
Authors and experts examine what Herbert gets right and what he gets wrong, how lasguns might work and if Bene Gesserit and mentat capabilities are possible. The book also takes a look at whether the ecology of Dune is realistic or if it's theoretically possible to get information from the future. Could humans really evolve as Herbert suggests? How can one build a windtrap or a stillsuit?
I have no idea how it is; I haven't read it and probably won't ever get around to it, but I know about it because someone I know wrote one of the chapters. Knowing that we have a number of Dune fans (and scientists) around these parts, I was curious what folks here would think about it.