European Tribune

Display:
I love the idea of a single transferable vote, and I like the idea of a social event that allows for personal campaigning and debate between neighbors... but I also very much like the idea of a secret ballot and political privacy.  I mean, I guess the whole primary process is really a matter of activists and partisans who don't shy away from voicing their support for a given candidate, but the public nature of the voting process can leave room for intimidation, whether overt or subconscious, and therefore can put those holding minority opinions at a distinct disadvantage.  See spiral of silence.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 06:11:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Interesting link, stormy.

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 06:12:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Spiral of silence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Noelle-Neumann describes the spiral of silence as dynamic process, in which predictions about public opinion become fact as mass media's coverage of the majority opinion becomes the status quo, and the minority becomes less likely to speak out (Miller 2005:278). The theory, however, only applies to moral issues, not issues that can be proven right or wrong using facts.
Right.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 06:14:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, I didn't write the Wiki, and it's been a good long while since I studied the theory, but my hunch is that the disclaimer is overstated, and may be referring to what Noelle-Neumann studied vs. what she didn't study, not an indication that they theory is "untrue" of particular issues, however they might be defined.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 06:22:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I found the wiki article extreme in its reassurance to the reader that this is only about moral issues. They make the point in just about every paragraph.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 06:24:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the era of absentee ballots and internet voting it seems the concept of secret ballots has gone the way of the dodo.

Auferre, trucidare, rapere, falsis nominibus imperium; atque, ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 07:21:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It would be interesting to have a system of national ID card with public key encryption: a pair would be generated and the government would keep one key while the ID card would contain the other key.

Other than that, I cannot imagine internet voting ever being secure enough.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 07:37:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The infrastructure already exists in Finland. There are lots of links.

More also here

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 08:01:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Only if you mean "secret" from the State, not from your neighbors, employers and family members.  They do not have access to your absentee ballot or Internet voting record.  (Or shouldn't!)

I think that State reprisals against voters for particular parties or candidates is not a particularly huge concern in the so-called developed world.  But there are still plenty of people within our "Western" societies who could face personal or professional repercussions if their political leanings were to be known, or who for a variety of reasons would rather not have their co-workers or family members know who they vote for, even within the confines of a particular political party.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 08:38:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Absentee ballots means nothing prevents say, an employer to gather its employees and ask for them to fill up their absentee ballots. The only prevention from that would be the public outcry, which could be prevented with enough firing threats.

I'm certain some abusive spouses already force their spouses' votes this way.

Auferre, trucidare, rapere, falsis nominibus imperium; atque, ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 09:34:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's true, that's a very real danger.  Some jurisdictions have different ways of trying to deal with that, mainly by discouraging people from voting absentee -- such as placing conditions on who qualifies for an absentee ballot, or only counting the absentee ballots if there are enough of them to affect the outcome of a close vote.  But those don't really deal with what you're talking about, and I can't think of anything systemic that would.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 10:00:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recent Diaries
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series