European Tribune

Display:
Not that complicated really - just hard to explain ;-)

Please consult the MCC Laws of Cricket for comparison: 42 detailed laws each with numerous subclauses, 4 appendices, and a preamble. Cricket might be described as a game of trying to hit a bowled ball with a bat while surrounded by obstacles. And indeed if you play on the beach with the family, that just about covers it, because any disputed detail will be resolved in trust, a sense of fairness and the knowledge that it is being played for fun only.

But as you move up from fun to school to amateur to professional games and gamesmanship, it becomes necessary to define, with ever-increasing detail, a universal set of rules that cover every possible bureaucratic anomaly.

All games are inherently emergent. And democracy too. We are still in the process of defining the new rules of emergent democracy.

I would hope however that we could find very simple rules for interaction that would still produce the required complexity of output.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 06:11:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I am sure there must have been Diaries about e-Government and so on but I don't recall any.

MCC and the Art of Democracy is a good start!

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 06:17:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In fact, the system is not that complicated. Everything is procedural fluff except for this bit, which is the actual election procedure.

European Tribune - Iowa Caucus -- More Than You Want to Know

VII.  Formation of Presidential Preference Groups

  1.  Before Presidential preference groups form, the caucus chair must read [a] statement to all caucus attendees [saying the caucus is open to any member of the Democratic Party -- see link for text.]

  2.  At this point the caucus will divide into Presidential preference groups. Caucus participants have up to 30 minutes to align with a preference group. If the caucus wishes for more time, it should go to a vote of the whole caucus.  When the caucus divides, the caucus chair will direct the various preference groups to different areas of the room or different rooms, as the case may be.

  3.  Each group will then select a preference group chair.

  4.  The first formal action of the preference group chair shall be to count their members and report the size of their preference group to the caucus chair.

  5.  At this time any preference group(s) that is not viable (has fewer members than the viability threshold) must be given an opportunity to realign.

  • Non-viable groups can join with other viable preference groups or with other non-viable preference groups in order to attain viability.
  • Members of non-viable groups can choose not to realign, however they will not be awarded any delegates if they remain non-viable.
  • Members of viable preference groups are also allowed to realign if they so desire.

VIII.  Awarding Delegates

When all the remaining preference groups are viable, the caucus chair will determine the number of delegates that each preference group is entitled to
elect.

The number of delegates to be awarded to each preference group is determined by:
... the SAME number that was used to calculate viability, above.

After delegates are awarded to all viable preference groups, the caucus chair will total up the delegates awarded and compare it to the number of delegates to be
elected at the precinct.

Note: See link, Steps 23 and 24 for special situations.

In fact, the key is VI.5. The rest is still just procedural, or else common sense (that is, no more complicated than it needs to be).

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 06:19:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I mean VII.5.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 06:51:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
VII.5 is a feedback system, and as such is an interesting democratic device that is not often available in formal systems - where fast interactive realignment is excluded. It is one form of self-organization ;-)

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 06:58:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
VII.5. is the implementation of (Single) Transferable Vote, but you're right it includes an additional feedback element as people give their second, third, etc preferences as the procedure progresses, not all at the beginning.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 at 07:03:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
60 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
14 comments

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
2 comments

So I met Bill McKibben
by SacredCowTipper - Nov 20
1 comment

LQD: Geoengineering Ranked
by nanne - Nov 19
16 comments

Trains in Moravia
by DoDo - Nov 16
72 comments

The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20

A Modest Proposal
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 14
116 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series