Display:
Incidentally, I'd like to put here on the record that I predicted that the US would bomb Iran before the Congressional Elections in 2006. I was wrong.

In my defence, I would suggest that if the Bush-Cheney brigade had realised how bad the Congressional Elections were going to turn out and if they had the ruthless streak that I can envision on occasion, I think they would have done it.

My view is that they thought they could win the elections anyway, so it wasn't worth taking the risk that an Iran bombing would be seen as cynical political manoeuvering. I always thought they were going to lose the elections, so I felt they needed to gamble to get things on track.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Thu Feb 1st, 2007 at 07:14:14 AM EST
I think the reason they didn't attack last autumn was that they hadn't gotten around to putting forces in place, and that they were still hoping for things to get better in Iraq. They were always planning to do it, sooner or later, while Bush was in office.

A bomb, H bomb, Minuteman / The names get more attractive / The decisions are made by NATO / The press call it British opinion -- The Three Johns
by Alexander on Thu Feb 1st, 2007 at 03:18:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series