Display:
The thing is, there was a lot of jockeying, and intimidation, by the institutional players to try to scare away the more popular amateurs. Thus the early announcements by Besancenot and Buffet.

Having Bové in formally might encourage them to drop out. Voynet (because the Greens are currently inaudible and ridiculous given the favorable context) and Besancenot (becasue he was open to the idea) are possibles, and Buffet might be convinced (also to avid an humiliating flop). They all agree that there is a need for a single alt-left candidate, but they all want to be it. Bové has more popular appeal, and probably more legitimacy outside of the "apparatuses" - but as you point out, they do matter.

Who does get the 500 signatures will matter a lot.

(Laguiller is outside of al this, I agree, but she will lose votes if there is a superior - i.e. unique - alternative on the hard left)

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu Feb 1st, 2007 at 09:14:29 AM EST
Laguiller is already polling lower than in previous elections. With a credible hard-left alternative, LO might finally get cooked, and a good thing too.

The problem for Buffet and Besancenot (Buffet et Bontemps mean anything to you?) is precisely their respective apparatus, it seems to me. A split in the PCF is really possible if she stands down. And she doesn't have a signature problem.

Whereas Besancenot... does have a signature problem, and probably less hard opposition within le Ligue to his standing down.

Bové's candidature does, I agree, have that logic. He's out to get at least Besancenot to quit.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Feb 1st, 2007 at 09:30:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The PCF split continues, it's been a long time in the works. I'm disappointed that Buffet is running. The party's redressement in regional elections was how the party was being reconstructed as a national party. Not this way, and so it's possible Buffet will do some damage by being a candidate, we'll see.

As for activists, that bleeding has been going on for quite some time. Probably too much cooperation with the PS, especially the way the PS was in the '90's.

Imho would have been wiser to play it safe and sit this one out like in '74 and concentrate on rebuilding at the cantonal and regional level. Might've earned some credit by backing one of the anti-liberal candidates (though seems to me Bove was a bit too coy for a bit too long, and, well, Arlette is Arlette, fun to watch in action but seriously...) and grown the activist base, or at least the loyalty of many anti-liberal activists.

Oh well, she can't do worse than Hue. Not that that means anything - by not running, she would have of course done better.

Fai de bčn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant

by redstar on Thu Feb 1st, 2007 at 11:12:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know exactly what went on in the tractations at first, except that the Communists and the others were pretty much at cross purposes.

I think Bové didn't accept the conditions he would have had to for Buffet to get the Party to agree. As for Arlette, afaik there was never any question of her being the single candidate. She announced long before anyone else that she was LO's candidate and that was that.

I expect Buffet will go ahead rather than break the apparatus. Besancenot... Suppose he can't get his signatures and Bové can't get his either... There'd surely be support at the LCR for pooling sigs on Bové's name...

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Feb 1st, 2007 at 02:21:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I was going to diary on this awhile back, Marianne had a good article on what happened at the "Congress" of the anti-liberal left back when it happened, but the article wasn't on the web (print only) so it was sorta a pain in the butt too get it up (though you did similar with the attac social justice piece, i know....)

Probably will do so in future if you don't first, but only if anything changes. All the polling numbers are pretty low for hte LO, PCF and LCR, we'll see what Bove's entry does but my guess is not much.  

Fai de bčn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant

by redstar on Thu Feb 1st, 2007 at 02:45:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I strongly doubt that Buffet would consider withdrawing. The main concern of the Communist Party is to keep what still makes its (relative) political strength: its elected representatives at local level (municipalities and departments) and in the parliament. They can do so only if they have the support of the Socialist Party. Even if their score is low in the first round, they have something to bargain. If they join Bové, they might jeopardise their position in the following local elections.


"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
by Melanchthon on Fri Feb 2nd, 2007 at 03:26:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series