Display:
Shouldn't this Nobel Prize know better?

http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009657

by Torres on Mon Feb 12th, 2007 at 06:09:45 PM EST
Thanks for the link to an article illustrating so clearly the narrow-mindedness and the prejudices which are behind many statements made by Americans on European economy.

Here are some excerpts:

First, the postulate (should I say axiom?):

As is increasingly admitted, the economic performance in nearly every Continental country is generally poor compared to the U.S. and a few other countries that share the U.S.'s characteristics.

Then, the explanation. Continental Europeans have strange, outdated values which are obstacles to the sheer selfishness required to attain economic performance:

The weakness of these values on the Continent is not the only impediment to a revival of dynamism there. There is the solidarist aim of protecting the "social partners"--communities and regions, business owners, organized labor and the professions--from disruptive market forces. There is also the consensualist aim of blocking business initiatives that lack the consent of the "stakeholders"--those, such as employees, customers and rival companies, thought to have a stake besides the owners. There is an intellectual current elevating community and society over individual engagement and personal growth, which springs from antimaterialist and egalitarian strains in Western culture. There is also the "scientism" that holds that state-directed research is the key to higher productivity. Equally, there is the tradition of hierarchical organization in Continental countries. Lastly, there a strain of anti-commercialism.

Sometimes, Phelps sounds like a XIXth century colonial officer talking about the "savages":

But to be candid, I had not imagined that Continental Man might be less entrepreneurial. It did not occur to me that he had less need for mental challenge, problem-solving, initiative and responsibility.

And, yes, there can be no way except the American way!

It was a mistake of the Continental Europeans to think that they expressed the right values--right for them.

Given the depth of the problem, the solution must be radical:

Perhaps the way out--to go from unsatisfactory performance to high performance--will require not only reform of institutions but also a cultural shift

(emphasis mine)

We have already plenty of missionaries (most of the economic journalists) and it still doesn't work. Maybe we should try reeducation camps?

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet

by Melanchthon on Mon Feb 12th, 2007 at 07:37:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That. Was. Hilarious.

Another fun, unquoted part is:

Relatively few are keen on taking responsibility, or freedom (57% in Germany and 58% in France as against 61% in the U.S. and 65% in Canada), and relatively few are happy about taking orders (Italy 1.03, of a possible 3.0, and Germany 1.13, as against 1.34 in Canada and 1.47 in the U.S.).

Being keen on Freedom equals happiness at taking orders. LOL

In other made for Onion fare there was a recent piece in the NYT about Fox's plans for a rival to CNBC:

Fox to Begin a `More Business Friendly' News Channel
No one has ever accused CNBC, the cable TV home of Jim Cramer, Larry Kudlow and Maria Bartiromo, of being antibusiness. Until now.

[...]

At a media conference in New York yesterday, Mr. Murdoch said the Fox Business Channel would be "more business friendly than CNBC," which he said was quick to "leap on every scandal," according to a report on his remarks by BusinessWeek.com, whose parent, McGraw-Hill, sponsored the conference.

In a separate interview, Mr. Ailes elaborated. "Many times I've seen things on CNBC where they are not as friendly to corporations and profits as they should be."

He added: "We don't get up every morning thinking business is bad."
[...]

Asked whether that meant that Fox would go easy on its reporting of the type of corporate scandals like Enron and WorldCom that cost individual investors millions of dollars when those companies collapsed, Mr. Ailes replied: "We will be as ruthless in our coverage of business scandals as we have always been." He said that while thousands of companies have publicly traded securities, "only 9 or 10 are in trouble" at a given time.

That last bit fits in with the type of coverage of Iraq that conservatives demand: 24,999,900 Iraqi were not blown up today while shopping, 24,996,000 did not flee the country in terror, 134,997 US troops survived this day - let's talk about some of those.

by MarekNYC on Mon Feb 12th, 2007 at 07:58:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series