What do you mean? Do you mean the makers of that graph, who are UNICEF people and thus quite likely not Anglo-Saxons? Or do you mean the general issue that 'unemployment' means only people officially recognised as part of the 'workforce', and not people who 'don't seek a job'/don't receive unemployment benefits/are invalids/retired, is something originating with Anglo-Saxons? *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
So why are these high levels of 'worklessness' not a worry, not an indictment of these systems? Because these people are not counted in prominent statistics, they do not exist and do not matter, and thus cannot be used to criticse the system that breeds them.
It's a stunning cae of double standards. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
Or deep in debt? Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.
