Display:
I would suggest strengthening the last section. It would not just be better to keep opinions to the editorial pages, but it is inappropriate to allow them to permeate throughout the news sections. And it is distressing that this happens.

If you don't like Ségolène Royal, that is your prerogative, but it would certainly be better if such bias could be avoided in what are meant to be factual articles, and kept in your editorial section.

My suggestion:
If you don't like Ségolène Royal, that is your prerogative, but it is distressing that such bias seems to inappropriately influence the reporting in what is meant to be factual articles. Surely it is enough that such opinions be expressed in your editorial section, where they belong.

by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Thu Feb 15th, 2007 at 05:19:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I would just change "meant to be" to "purported to be" -- since it's doubtful that the article was really MEANT to be factual.

Karen in Austin

'tis strange I should be old and neither wise nor valiant. From "The Maid's Tragedy" by Beaumont & Fletcher

by Wife of Bath (kareninaustin at g mail dot com) on Thu Feb 15th, 2007 at 09:11:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series