Display:
I got 6 for Bové, 9 for Buffet, 13 for Royal.

I don't get how they weight the responses*. Nor why I didn't score even a single point for Voynet.

*  They "explain" under Methodology that each response may give points to one or several candidates, according to the importance of the policy in their programme.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 09:05:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
They only display the three with the first three most points?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 09:13:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Which obviously can be highly subjective.
I like what the Finnish media do: they have the candidates sit down and answer the same questionnaire, where they get to rate the importance of each question. Then it's quite easy to compare your answers to the candidates' answers...

"The basis of optimism is sheer terror" - Oscar Wilde
by NordicStorm (michael<-at->sturmbaum.net) on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 09:18:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series