Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

what happened to my own company and what is about to happen to my unit in it.

Once upon a time, there was a loss-making state railway company, but also a public opinion not friendly to the idea of its privatisation, and no prospective buyers on the horizon.

What do governments advised by neoliberals/adhering to neoliberalism do?

Until they don't dare a direct attack, the company is subject to

  1. denial of investment funds (except for projects co-funded by the EU, and those are done with lack of system awareness), while rival transport modes get major funding (highways, airports);
  2. further centralisation of decisionmaking especially on money issues, ostensibly to control what's spent but in practice stiffling autonomous actions and putting sand in the gears;
  3. constant alibi reorganisations, ostensibly towards a 'more rational' or a 'market-oriented' constellation, but in practice achieving a situation where people don't know who is responsible for what (sometimes not even what organisational unit they belong to), and  workers are demoralised (you can live better even in a bad system if you can at least get to learn it);
  4. reductions of the workforce, ostensibly to raise productivity, in practice achieving the loss of the best people (who retire or go into a different business), operational problems where key people were spared, and of course mid-level bosses protecting their favourites and firing able men.

With this practice, a loss-making state company can be run down into a ghost of its former self in a few years. And then the hyper-hypocritical arguments can come: it is hopelessly loss-making despite our best efforts, let's cut it up and privatise its parts!

They best leave a further few years between the cutting up and the sell-off, because cutting up brings further de-coordination and broken-up dependencies.

This is the macro view, now for the micro view.

Despite all prior difficulties and one re-organisation a year, my small unit within the state railway company managed to mostly stay together, makes a profit by also taking industry orders, and is highly productive.

But we learnt today that (1) we have been transplanted from one big branch to another, (2) our new owners are eyeing us for their quota for further workforce reduction ordered by the government. That we make profit doesn't count, in fact it appears that they will take away our right to take on orders. And even so, we already reached the minimum practicable level of workforce, taking away more will mean that we simply won't be able to do our job.

If we can't find connections who can change something, here is my 95% certain prediction: (1) we will turn unprofitable, (2) most of the unit will be dissolved, (3) as different branches of the cut-up company are privatised, they will discover that other branches aren't functional without parts of ours, so our branch will be cut up between them and a rump will remain, (4) the rump will be dissolved.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 05:40:24 AM EST
And then peak oil will hit and everyone will wonder "what ever happened to our railways?"

Could your unit take the fight to the press?

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 05:42:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No. We would be finished in a day.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 05:46:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Keep a record and write a book after they are done destroying the railways. By then you'll have another job (sadly, given your love of trains).

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 06:01:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Being depression-resistant is required job qualification in the current state of the company ;-)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 07:50:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That is really dramatic and I hate to hear there is no rebellion left.  Migueru said the press and I am expanding... international press, youtube, trade press (rail, shipping, transportation) and the REAL media:  bloggers, railway bloggers that have come up lately are worth a try.  Just hoping it is not a foregone conclusion.

Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.
by metavision on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 06:56:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It could still be that our lower bosses can talk our new mid-level bosses out of part of this. Or that we find some connections on other parts of the hierarchy who could intervene. (Happened before.) Or that part of us could be saved into a private limited company -- but then our dependence on the cooperation of other parts of the railway will grow more of a problem. All this won't save the railway itself on the long run, only radical political change would.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 07:48:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Awful, just awful.  This stuff has become so predictable (and yet the press can't get the narrative right...), and yet it still angers me every time I hear it.
by andrethegiant on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 06:36:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
sounds eerily like Amtrak in the US.

some call it the Cinderella treatment:  starve it and make it sleep on the hearth while the stepsisters (air and highway) wallow in free handouts and subsidies.

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 at 07:52:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Occasional Series