Display:
I see that what weakens the union politically is the small number of Eurosceptic countries who have not become any more cooperative after these 15 years.

That doesn't mean that a two-speed Europe won't also weaken it politically.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Mar 26th, 2007 at 07:37:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
My concern is that many of the initiatives you might want to put in place incur a cost that wouldn't be borne by opting out countries who could then compete unfairly against other members of the Union, exploiting the free-trade aspect of it. I believe that the UK is already doing this by opting out of the Social Charter. This is only going to get worse.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Mar 26th, 2007 at 07:41:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What is better? To accept the uK as free rider, or to do nothing?

The cost of some countries opting out would need to be factored into the decision to go ahead, but since the EU already doesn't prevent member states from entering bilateral or multilateral arrangements, all I'm saying is that those should be made part of the EU structure.

Also, new applicants for membership don't get to opt out of anything.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Mar 26th, 2007 at 07:43:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The UK stopped opting out of the social charter in 1997 (effective in 1999).
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 26th, 2007 at 12:38:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't see it as any worse than the current gridlock.

Your problem is that Ireland is prevented by the UK from taking advantage of a certain enhanced cooperation (though you are in the Euro)

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Mar 26th, 2007 at 07:41:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series