Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

I don't think having the executive come out of the largest parliamentary faction is good for separation of powers. The failure of the national parliaments to investigate the CIA prison/flight scandal is just the best and most recent example of this.

So, codecision and making the Commission President not owe their place to either Parliament or Council sould be a good thing.

Also, how the President is selected has nothing to do with how they are removed. One could still allow the EP to impeach them, to confirm the appointments of the commissioners, etc.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Mar 26th, 2007 at 07:46:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You sound a bit like a thirties US neoliberal :-)

What makes you think that a directly elected President would be more likely to act on an issue like the CIA prison/flight scandal than a directly elected Parliament?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Mar 26th, 2007 at 08:44:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, I'm saying that a parliament tied to the executive is even less likely to act.

The less the people in the various institutions owe their seats to each other (or to the same outside agent) the better.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Mar 26th, 2007 at 08:51:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Occasional Series