The end of the article is clear, thanks to "economists":
However, these reforms only nibble at the welfare state. More comprehensive changes, including pension and health care reform and a claw-back of generous welfare benefits that reduce the incentive to work will only be dealt with in a later package, a delay that some economists have criticized. "2007 may be the best year for economic reforms," said Pavel Sobiek, chief economist for HVB Bank.
"2007 may be the best year for economic reforms," said Pavel Sobiek, chief economist for HVB Bank.
I should say, "economists" and ideologically one-track-minded FT correspondents.
Somehow I don't get the impression the journalist is considering the point of view of poorer people.