Display:
There was something peculiar about Britain among the provinces of the Western Roman Empire, because in other places (Spain, France, Italy) while cities did wither and population declined, the end of the Roman Empire was not catastrophic.

As for comparing a putative future collapse of The West™ to that of the Soviet Union, there's this lecture by Dmitry Orlov (I think I first got a link to that from ET, but I don't know in what thread).

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Mar 7th, 2007 at 07:52:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think you're underestimating the effects. For many people it clearly was catastrophic. The earth wasn't scorched, farming didn't necessarily stop altogether, but some cities were invaded or overrun, and trade diminished drastically.

If you were a merchant or someone else in the middle classes, I'd expect that it was very catastrophic indeed. If you were one of the peasants, possibly not so much.

The ruling elites were either slaughtered or adapted to new masters - which would doubtless have been catastrophic for them too.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Mar 7th, 2007 at 08:25:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series