No more taxes! Unless you're rich!
Now, the standard answer would be: "Well, that won't raise enough money."
So: Is it possible to raise some numbers as follows?
ITEM OF SPECIFIC PRIVILEGE --> Charge For Having Specific Privilege --> Money that would be raised on today's figures (from charging those who have the specific privilege)
Then add it all up...to see how many privileges will need to be charged for in order to cover...what...basic living allowance, basic pension, basic healthcare for all--plus no taxes for...those not benefiting from the specific privilege? Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
But the challenge is more complicated that just taking a shapshot of values at a moment in time. We need models based on a generalizable set of factors such that we can perform dynamic modeling. As soon as we start shifting taxes onto privilege the value of privileges will change (and quickly). For example, core urban land will probably become more valuable while the the far edge suburbs will lose value. If US cities become more compact and livable, the rent of oil bearing lands might decrease.
In the first case it is a concept that applies to every member of the society (even if some have more privileges than others), especially if we consider property as a privilege.
In the second case, it is a rhetorical figure which can be used in a political narrative.
"Ne te courbe que pour aimer..." René Char