European Tribune

Display:
Just some general comments for now...
If no one or very few benefit from an industrial base then what good is it? I can understand that during an industrial base buildup that the benefits may not "trickle down" very well but at some time (E. Germany) it is either a success or a failure.

Yes, any two countries that merge will have a lot of frictional aspects. That is what made "Goodbye Lenin" such an interesting story line. And not just culturally, it seems like a lot of movement of peoples also.

------------------------------ Rutherfordian RDRutherford

by Ronald Rutherford (rdrradio1@msn.com) on Tue Apr 17th, 2007 at 01:22:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The east german public was benefitting from east german industry. East Germany was the most prosperous Soviet Bloc country.

To imply that job security, an ok living standard and free education and health care is not benefits for the population is a bit of a stretch. DDR was a repressive communist dictatorship, but the East German people were better off (especially materially) than the majority of the people in the world today.

But no matter what one might feel about the specific case of the DDR, it is nevertheless outside of the scope of what I was talking about in my diary. That part of Germany has been industrialised since the Bismarck era.

by Trond Ove on Thu Apr 19th, 2007 at 08:55:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series