Display:
EU Member States Differ on Anti-Terror Measures | Europe | Deutsche Welle | 25.04.2007
Even though the European Union has a common counter-terrorism strategy, its implementation is left to individual member states. That is why anti-terror legislations differ from country to country.

Terrorism is not a new phenomenon in Europe. In the United Kingdom, Spain and Ireland alone, it has claimed 5,000 deaths over the last 30 years.

The Sept. 11 attacks on the United States, however, have had a rippling effect across the Atlantic as well. Faced with the challenges posed by the war against international terrorism, which were only heightened by the attacks in London and Madrid, European countries were forced to adapt and expand their anti-terror legislations.

"Legislative and institutional requirements have definitely become stricter in all 27 member states of the European Union," said Annegret Bendiek of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and author of a study on fighting terrorism in the EU.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 12:51:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Faced with the challenges posed by the war against international terrorism, which were only heightened by the attacks in London and Madrid, European countries were forced to adapt and expand their anti-terror legislations.

Forced?!?!??? Yeah, terror legislation is inevitable, we can only implement what is already 'forced' upon us by circumstance. No choices were made at all! Much like we are 'forced' to liberalise, deregulate and privatise 'markets' no doubt.

by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 03:24:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Spain already had an "Anti-terror law" dating from the 1980's which has been denounced repeatedly by human rights organisations.

Spain was not "forced" to adapt and expend its anti-terror laws like the UK did. It's always a choice.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 05:01:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
How did they get that number? Sounds high to me.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 06:51:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Northern Ireland managed about 3500 or so, if you include actions by security forces as part of the total.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 06:55:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's not.

Wikipedia: The Troubles

Between 1969 and 2001, 3,523 people were killed as a result of the Troubles.

Wikipedia: ETA

ETA has committed approximately 900 killings and dozens of kidnappings.

So we're at 4,500, including minor players in the Basque conflict.

If you round before adding, you have "nearly 4000 in Ireland and the UK" and "nearly 1000 in Spain".

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 06:58:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I had the number right in my mind for ETA, but I did not realize there were so many death in Ireland.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 07:00:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The "past 30 years" qualifier eliminates some very deadly years of the Troubles.  Some 500 people were killed in 1972 alone, I believe.  The overall death toll hit 1,000 in 1974.

There's also a definition issue... in that not all the deaths in N. Ireland were attributed to "terrorism."

Not that I'm saying the estimate is wrong.  I think it's accurate, but it's also a very hard (and politically loaded) thing to measure.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 07:06:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
30 years, 40 years, whatever, good enough for an op-ed.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 07:18:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series