Display:
Yet most of the political appeal of markets is that they hide the true costs to consumers. That is why carbon markets exist in the first place.

Whoa, there goes the "markets are best for price discovery" and "perfect information".

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 08:32:59 AM EST
I know: a sudden burst of reality. I'm assuming that normal service will resume soon.

Maybe we should write an LTE encouraging them?

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 08:35:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I mean, they just demolished the argument for market liberalisation in energy markets as well as infrastructure/service separation in utilities and transportation.

Jerome already wrote an op-ed [which was never run in the UK edition?] about how the effect of market (marginal) pricing for energy was never explained to the public.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 08:40:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... in consumer sovereignty to think that consumers are the ones that most need to receive the information about the cost of emitting carbon per ton.

Consumers need to be presented with a different price differential for products of carbon-using and non-carbon-using products ... they really do not need to know in detail how much of the change in price differential is a result of that.

Its those engaged in long term development and investment projects that need the information. Give them a thick market in carbon emission permits, and they'll have that information.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Thu Apr 26th, 2007 at 11:52:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series