The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
noblesse oblige |n??bles ??bl? zh | the inferred responsibility of privileged people to act with generosity and nobility toward those less privileged
On the insurance, I'm still puzzled with your comment. I unfortunately have had very direct experience with close family members who have had cancer--very lengthy and expensive bouts. Insurance covered basically everything. and as you probably know, you get to know other people (in life generally, but specifically if you're spending a lot of time in treatment centers) as you go through this painful process. and people are more open and sharing in such troubled times. the only situation that i ran into was with a gentlemen that did not have insurance, who was stage IV and his current treatments were not working, and was wanting to try a drug that was not approved for his particular cancer. he was working the system, and I don't know how that came out.
I just called a good friend of mine who is a hospital ceo. he is not aware of anyone with insurance that has gone bankrupt attempting to pay for cancer treatments. he said that there are lifetime maximums on some policies, but when you go past your max there are a number of other factors that come into play. (our conversation became a little detailed here, so I leave that out.)
I'm not challenging that you have run into this, just saying that I have not, in an experience that has been pretty broad.
I just called a good friend of mine who is a hospital ceo. he is not aware of anyone with insurance that has gone bankrupt attempting to pay for cancer treatments.
You could try asking some of the patients. Perhaps some of those who don't get to hospital in the first place.
Once again, you just don't know most of the people on this website, or their backgrounds. Nor do Izzy and Migeru who so happily give your comment a 4.
In my case, I know many, many patients and people with health issues--both from the patient side since I have had perhaps an unusual amount of illness in my immediate family (if you hang out in treatment centers for cancer, you meet a lot of patients and their family--I hope you are lucky enough not to find this out), and from the professional side since I've been involved in developing products for doctors to treat patients (and yes you meet them, watch them treated, etc.) and involved in home health care.
The three of you have these arrogant attitudes that preclude anyone who has a different view than yours as to how economies can best run, from being compassionate people, that also want the best for mankind. You don't allow that people that work in companies that develop and make products to help people in their lives, do this partially because they are compassionate people. (I'm no real exception--there are literally hundreds of thousands of people like me that do this for a living, and feel wonderful when a product that they participate in developing, or show a doctor how to use on a patient,,that feel personally rewarded. they devote their lives to this--and you are ignorant of that, or just outright reject it.) This I am better than you attitude is disgusting to me. The idea that I don't talk to patients, know people with problems, try to help them as best I can--you are a supercillious bunch, that is for sure!
I'm going to reply more substantively to your more heartfelt comment below, but will mention here that meeting people does not necessarily equate with understanding them. Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
The idea that I don't talk to patients, know people with problems, try to help them as best I can
thanks for taking my rant with some good humour.
I'll refrain from commenting about what a ceo may or may not know about insurance. Suffice it to say almost no one has long-term care insurance -- practically no nursing home coverage -- and a chronic illness, or series of illnesses, can easily drain the coffers over a course of years.
As your ceo may even be aware, there are myriad types of insurance coverage with various co-pays, deductibles, exculsions, prescription pay scales, catastrophic caps, lifetime care caps, you name it -- there's a ton of ways to suck someone dry. In fact, what used to be some of the better insurance plans were the ones with 80/20 coverage -- they'd pay 80% and you were 20% out of pocket -- nowadays 20% of even one hospitalization can be disasterous (although probably not to a millionaire, admittedly), nevermind a decade or so of care. Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
Unfortunately I have the long term care issue as well, with a parent. also no long term care insurance. still hard for me to see a multi-millionaire going bankrupt, but I obviously don't know the care requirements, and I imagine in some cases that could be a lot.
I wonder how that situation is handled in the UK or France? I honestly don't know.
by DoDo - May 20 9 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 13 comments
by gmoke - May 17 1 comment
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 209 comments
by gmoke - May 171 comment
by ARGeezer - May 1613 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments