Display:
If we suppose that a US government sees its task to demonstrate strength in economy by stimulatig Dow value (in dollars), wouldn't be the easiest way to achieve that to take steps (blown up deficit spending and such) that depriciate dollar?

I think that Bush's administration did a lot (if not everything) to increase "demand" for speculative stocks and decrease demand for dollar. Oh yeah, that's what they are preaching - supply-side economy, push all the money into stocks.

by das monde on Sat Apr 28th, 2007 at 06:14:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Dow [I suppose we're talking the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average">Industrial Average here] doesn't represent "speculative stocks" but big industrial ones. Intel is the only component of the Average that's listed on NASDAQ (the more speculative of the big markets), the rest are on NYSE.

Bush is a symptom, not the disease.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Apr 28th, 2007 at 06:54:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
correct.  and actually I don't use the Dow in benchmarking my personal investments.  I used broader indices such as the S&P 500, the US total market indices, the Morgan and Stanley set of international indices.  I use the Dow here and in other broader discussion formats because it is a number that is more widely known, and it tracks the other broader US indices reasonably well.
by wchurchill on Sat Apr 28th, 2007 at 12:59:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, Microsoft is, as well.  That's to be expected, given the importance and  dominance of Intel and Microsoft.  NASDAQ is typically associated with tech stocks, although HP, IBM and Verizon are all on the Dow and the NYSE.

The Dow is, as you say, less speculative.  It's essentially the big dogs in American business.  If you want to know where America is headed, though, the S&P and NASDAQ are probably the better choices, given the larger number of companies.

DJIA is where you dump your money when you want to play a conservative game, because people are always going to buy things from Wal-Mart and Johnson & Johnson.  It's more stable, whereas NASDAQ is all over the place.  NASDAQ companies are often engaged in fiercely competitive markets and can get tossed around like it's nobody's business.  Intel and AMD come to mind.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Sun Apr 29th, 2007 at 09:22:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series