Display:
Aha! Yet another example of need for European infrastructure integration! We need a continental rail service department which builds and operates a European train network, run from Brussels. Obviously, an important sector like basic infrastructure for movement of people and goods cannot be efficiently and reliably provided by the private sector. National approaches are too small scale and cause problems with cross border transit. Thus the obvious need for a European level rail operator, providing fast and convenient links between major European metropolitan areas. With subsidies to ensure a favourable comparison with the pests that are low cost airlines, and taxes on air fuel...
by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Wed Apr 4th, 2007 at 05:57:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hmm, I never finished my map of the "natural" EU high-speed rail network in the vein of BruceMcF's diary.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Apr 4th, 2007 at 06:03:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Exactly was I was going to say!

The European Rail Road Agency, railroading local communities from Porto to Tallinn!

Seriously, this should really be a federal issue.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Wed Apr 4th, 2007 at 08:27:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Why stop at Tallinn?

Seriously, this is exactly where I was going with this. And if I might be permitted to connect a few more dots, this is seriously a competitivity issue.

Anybody remember this from last week?

Now, remember that what Migeru says about what happened to regional carriers in France after the TGV roll-out is largely true, and it stands to reason that if one can get to Barca or Rome of Franfurt from Paris in 5 hours, this will put some more pressure on other carriers. And then, open skies agreement with US is clearly advantageous to the EU and EU carriers, and less so to US carriers.

The important thing is what lacordaire is alluding to, above. Which is clearly a case where competition, and I mean this in a larger sense, is not served by competing firms whose interests are simply expressed by the state entities (like db) to further the sorts of parochial interests that weaken Europe.

The answer is less market liberalisation, not more.

Fai de bèn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant

by redstar on Wed Apr 4th, 2007 at 10:20:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series