Display:
Another really funny horror cult movie: The Day of the Beast (1995) by álex de la Iglesia.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Apr 6th, 2007 at 07:41:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thinking of it, El habitante incierto could also be classed as horror. And there is that Dutch(/French) classic, Spoorloos, one of the scariest movies ever -- but I'd recommend both of these to the diarist, to learn what artists can do with the genre (e.g., when gore and loud noises aren't the directors' only tools).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Apr 6th, 2007 at 12:45:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I saw Spoorloos in a theater. It is one of the most disturbing films I have ever seen; I don't ever want to see it again. (I did see the American remake though, which was of course watered down.)

El habitante incierto must be pretty obscure; I've never heard of it, and the only version of it I found on the Internet doesn't have English subtitles. But it has been released as a DVD in the US. Thanks.

A bomb, H bomb, Minuteman / The names get more attractive / The decisions are made by NATO / The press call it British opinion -- The Three Johns

by Alexander on Fri Apr 6th, 2007 at 03:42:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I saw Spoorloos in a theater.

Uh! How did your fellow viewers look when they left the cinema?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Fri Apr 6th, 2007 at 05:16:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That was about twenty years ago, when it came out, so I don't really remember. I imagine they looked like my friend and I did: pretty shaken.

A Dutch film I saw recently is Paul Verhoeven's De vierde Man. It's ceepy but not in a dark way, the predecessor of Basic Instinct.

BTW, I have ordered El habitante incierto.

A bomb, H bomb, Minuteman / The names get more attractive / The decisions are made by NATO / The press call it British opinion -- The Three Johns

by Alexander on Fri Apr 6th, 2007 at 07:13:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
By the way, several babyboomer-generation people told me that the most scary movie for them was And Soon the Darkness (1970), a British film about two English girls on vacation in France and menanced by a murderer, with most of the film merely showing the girls from the viewpoint of the stalking murderer. Haven't seen it myself, have you?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Apr 6th, 2007 at 05:26:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I saw it on DVD a couple of years ago. (That was before I got a high speed internet connection.) As I recall, I didn't find it all that scary, but that was probably from a combination of its having a low-budget feel and its being often from the killer's view point, making it somewhat sick, both of which made me not want to get into it too much. I'm sure that if I saw it in a cinema, where  it is harder to distance yourself from a movie, I would have found it pretty scary.

I guess I like my horror and violence to be highly aestheticized, like in Argento or The Shining. If it's done in a realistic way, I generally find it too disturbing to be fun.

Speaking of documentary-style horror, have you seen Cannibal Holocaust? I'd say that pushes the genre as far as it has ever gone. Definitely not recommended to Ronald Rutherford. Unlike And Soon the Darkness, this movie has a political message (but it contains one scene that I knew about that I skipped over).

And from Germany, we have Der Todesking and Schramm. Again, not recommended to Ronald.

A bomb, H bomb, Minuteman / The names get more attractive / The decisions are made by NATO / The press call it British opinion -- The Three Johns

by Alexander on Fri Apr 6th, 2007 at 06:44:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I guess I like my horror and violence to be highly aestheticized
I am generally no fan of horror at all, so being impressed by the above is a special quality.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Apr 6th, 2007 at 06:59:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series