Display:
I realise as well that buried in my response, but also in this FT column is an issue that really affects any discussion of the rail network, that is the state of the road network.

The point about the state of the rail network here is that it is incapable of meeting current demand at a time when the roads (up here, don't know about London generally, but the M25 has some bad times too) is approaching gridlock.

One of the main ways you can see the rail network is performing better in other parts of Europe is simply that the road network has not been pushed to such a brink (generally) because rail is an effective alternative.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Apr 10th, 2007 at 08:46:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's strategic non-planning in action. The government isn't really interested in getting the job done, so much as keeping sweet with the City, the infrastructure companies, and the construction companies.

A new stretch of motorway typically costs between two and five times as much as an equivalent rail link. But according to the Treasury, rail is 'too expensive.'

In most countries this would be considered corruption and would be investigated by the General Accounting Office.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Apr 10th, 2007 at 09:15:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series