Should a UN mandate be needed? Which countries can see the intervention of NATO troops without a UN mandate? Is there a troop size trigger? Who decides? Which NATO members' forces participate? In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
The decision to deploy such a force are to be taken by the member states and that usually means under a UN mandate even though NATO is a stand alone organisational, that has always been the strength of the organization, but most NATO operations have usually been based on a UN mandate, with the exception of the Kosovo operation. The participants in the NRF and thus such an operation are to be drawn from the member states on a rotational basis, decided upon in the Prague meeting in 2002.
Most of the procedures for such a rapid reaction forces have yet to be decided upon are still on the drawing board, but this kind of operation has to be decided by the NATO member states and will, I imagine, be of a more protective nature like escorting tankers through troubled waters. Still, in some cases it could mean rescuing hostages or intervene in a situation where big installations, including oil and gas installations, are under attack from terrorist or guerrilla forces.
Here are some NATO links 1. 2. and 3. that might shade some light on the mission and purpose of these RR Forces. The details are yet to be hammered out. Bitsofnews.com Giving you the latest bits.