Now, if you could arrange a system where cooperative LLPs crowd out toxic corporations for solid market reasons (oh, the irony...), you might be onto something.
You put your finger on how it will happen. The "Cooperative Advantage" is the freedom from paying returns to rentiers.
Those businesses that do NOT use these tools will be at a disadvantage to those that do. Classic Darwinism.
That's where "Community Partnerships" come in.
I would advocate a couple of forms (and its not either/or) of "rental".
One is a "location benefit levy" based upon the amount of land occupied and the location/desirability of it, as measured by land rental value.
This levy would be pooled and redistributed evenly to members of the "Community Partnership" resulting in a net transfer from those who have exclusive use of more, and more "desirable", land to those who have less.
The second is a levy based upon income (or production of land, for farms) eg x% of income goes into a pot, is pooled and redistributed evenly.
And most people will have a hard time affording either.
