That's where "Community Partnerships" come in.
I would advocate a couple of forms (and its not either/or) of "rental".
One is a "location benefit levy" based upon the amount of land occupied and the location/desirability of it, as measured by land rental value.
This levy would be pooled and redistributed evenly to members of the "Community Partnership" resulting in a net transfer from those who have exclusive use of more, and more "desirable", land to those who have less.
The second is a levy based upon income (or production of land, for farms) eg x% of income goes into a pot, is pooled and redistributed evenly.
And most people will have a hard time affording either.
