Display:
What has changed in the past 30 years has been a new ingredient, brought to us by economists: the idea that our own selfishness is good for others, and thus that by taking care of us and of our own, we were actually also helping others.

I don't think this is really new, it is only the latest reincarnation of modern colonialism: we don't take over over other people just because we are stronger, but because we bring them something good. The Good News of Christianity, civilisation, enlightement and declaration of human rights, modernism, whatever.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Sun May 27th, 2007 at 11:26:41 AM EST
A new idea from the last 30 years? Don't make me laugh!
It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our necessities but of their advantages. — Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations


Bush is a symptom, not the disease.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun May 27th, 2007 at 11:29:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This one only says that people wll only enter in transactions with you that are to your benefit if these are also to THEIR benefit. I fail to see a claim that this will ALSO be good for parties outside of the transaction, as the neolibs claim today, whehter by trickle down or otherwise.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun May 27th, 2007 at 11:32:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series