Display:
First, welcome to European Tribune, the last place that still resists to the Sarko-saxons invaders!

And I agree with you. The main question is:  will the civil society be able to stand up to Sarkozy?

Given the mobilisation that took place during this campaign, I am reasonably confident. But I think it will rely on the unions and civil society organisations. The Socialist Party will not be able to play a major role for a while.
I  

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet

by Melanchthon on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 02:39:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And this is probably good.  The PS willingly lost this election for their own candidate.  That said I expect nobody today is as sad as Jacques Chirac for he knows that his multi-polar world and the triumphant stand he made against Iraq, lifting the French back into a leading international position, will be fading.

The good news with Sarkozy kissing-up to the US is that the Republicans are very much on their way out in the US.  He will be licking the boots of a Democrat very soon.  They already control the Legislature.

by paving on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 02:43:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Shame on the French Socialists and their machisme. And shame on the rest of the European Socialists who didn't see this for the important election that it was and didn't go to France to support Royal (maybe they weren't invited either).

Bush is a symptom, not the disease.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 04:16:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
 
will the civil society be able to stand up to Sarkozy?

I'll play the advocatus diaboli and ask: which civil society? The one which just elected him by a safe margin? At a huge turnout?

I think you guys should just accept the result and refrain from treating the winner as a tyrant, to whom the civil society should 'stand up'.

Royal was the simply less attractive candidate to the decisive 6% of voters and you should discuss the reasons why.

by MarcinGomulka on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 05:25:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think you guys should just accept the result and refrain from treating the winner as a tyrant, to whom the civil society should 'stand up'.

Should I have said that to the Democrats in 2004?

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
by Melanchthon on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 05:38:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, the point about the high participation and high rate of voter registration applies to France. Hasn't the civil society expressed itself?

Bush is a symptom, not the disease.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 05:40:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That was the lowest winning margin of any US Wartime President ever. And even then it required stealing the vote in Ohio to ensure against a electoral college loss with a majority of the total vote.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 07:54:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series