Display:
 
will the civil society be able to stand up to Sarkozy?

I'll play the advocatus diaboli and ask: which civil society? The one which just elected him by a safe margin? At a huge turnout?

I think you guys should just accept the result and refrain from treating the winner as a tyrant, to whom the civil society should 'stand up'.

Royal was the simply less attractive candidate to the decisive 6% of voters and you should discuss the reasons why.

by MarcinGomulka on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 05:25:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think you guys should just accept the result and refrain from treating the winner as a tyrant, to whom the civil society should 'stand up'.

Should I have said that to the Democrats in 2004?

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
by Melanchthon on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 05:38:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, the point about the high participation and high rate of voter registration applies to France. Hasn't the civil society expressed itself?

Bush is a symptom, not the disease.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 05:40:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That was the lowest winning margin of any US Wartime President ever. And even then it required stealing the vote in Ohio to ensure against a electoral college loss with a majority of the total vote.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 07:54:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series