Display:
Sad but true. So far it's only Italy and Spain that have turned back this tide (Portugal as well, to some extent). Canada has a neo-con government, and Britain may too depending on how well Brown can revive Labour's fortunes.

It's worth noting that in every case, the right has won only VERY narrow victories - see Bush in 2000 and 2004, or Harper's minority government in Canada, or the fact that Merkel has to govern with the SPD, or that Sarko didn't get such a wide margin in the end.

Still...depressing.

And the world will live as one

by Montereyan (robert at calitics dot com) on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 05:39:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Italy's is razor thin and Spain has a minority government. All margins seem to be getting narrower and narrower. I wonder whether that reflects increasing efficiency of the political machines of all parties in the identification and pursuit of the "median voter".

Bush is a symptom, not the disease.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 05:42:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Good points, I'd forgotten that Zapatero has a minority government himself.

I think the sophisticated targeting is part of it, sure. But I also think it is because of the hold neoliberal thinking now has on the industrial democracies. Moderates who are repelled by the right don't feel comfortable voting for a left that they don't feel is sufficiently on-board with neoliberalism, so they'll vote for the right at times out of a belief that the "left" - even when "left" is Labour or the Democrats, hardly leftist parties - is inherently unfit to govern. At the same time, the crises and dislocations that neoliberalism creates mobilize more people to oppose it, creating high turnout and very close elections.

This phase won't end until the left has found a way to revive its fortunes, assert a clear agenda that opposes neoliberalism, and find a way around a deeply hostile media establishment.

And the world will live as one

by Montereyan (robert at calitics dot com) on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 05:50:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... the US bully pulpit, to give credibility to any opposition of neoliberal TINA (there is no alternative) thinking?

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 07:57:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That is one reason I support Edwards (I post at dKos as "eugene"). His language is significantly anti-neoliberal. I believe you are an Edwards supporter as well...I think...

And the world will live as one
by Montereyan (robert at calitics dot com) on Sun May 6th, 2007 at 08:38:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Good to see you around here. I'm always glad to have you fighting on my side over at dailykos!

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon May 7th, 2007 at 08:28:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... not that he's a flaming radical. Indeed, as Gravel reminded a few people{1}, there's nobody in the top tier who would be seen of as having a "progressive" foreign policy from a 70's perspective ... but unless the US is in the middle of what is seen as a serious effort for Energy Independence when the real crunch comes, its only going to get worse.

{1. ... though most just saw him as a crazy old coot}

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon May 7th, 2007 at 09:32:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series