Display:
This Salon.com post on Taiwan is captivating. It cites Tonio Andrade's monograph "How Taiwan Became Chinese". The central thesis is that the Dutch were in the long run responsible for the Sinification of Taiwan. From Andrade's work:

Intensive Chinese colonization began abruptly in the 1630s, shortly after the Dutch East India Company established a trading port on Taiwan. The Dutch realized that their port's hinterlands could produce rice and sugar for export, but they were unable to persuade Taiwan's aborigines to raise crops for sale -- most were content to plant just enough for themselves and their families. The colonists considered importing European settlers, but the idea was rejected by their superiors in the Netherlands. So they settled instead on a more unusual plan: encourage Chinese immigration. The Dutch offered tax breaks and free land to Chinese colonists, using their powerful military to protect pioneers from aboriginal assault... In this way the company created a calculable economic and social environment, making Taiwan a safe place for Chinese to move to and invest in, whether they were poor peasants or rich entrepreneurs. People from the province of Fujian, just across the Taiwan Strait, began pouring into the colony, which grew and prospered, becoming, in essence, a Chinese settlement under Dutch rule. The colony's revenues were drawn almost entirely from Chinese settlers, through taxes, tolls, and licenses. As one Dutch governor put it, "The Chinese are the only bees on Formosa that give honey."

That period was an proto-version of the modern globalization:

We can glimpse the structure of the new global trade by focusing on its most important commodity: silver. In 1637 a Spanish official wrote that "China... is the general center for the silver of Europe and Asia." Recent scholarship corroborates his view. During the sixteenth century, silver production and trade increased dramatically and, although the metal moved through a web of networks, most of it ended up in China. Indeed, China became a global "silver sink," drawing the metal from all over the world. So vast was China's demand that it may have affected major developments in Europe itself: "There would not have been a Spanish Empire in the absence of the transformation of the Chinese society to a silver base, nor would there have been the same sort of 'Price Revolution' (i.e., inflation) around the globe in the early modern period." China's thirst for silver shaped the pattern of global trade and colonialism and, what is most important for our inquiry, led to the colonization of Taiwan

And then there was Koxinga, a.k.a. "the pirate king of Taiwan," defeating both the Manchu invaders and the Dutch...

by das monde on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 01:02:56 AM EST
along with john shepherd's statecraft and poitical economy on the taiwan fronteir, 1600-1800, and emma teng's taiwan's imagined grography: chinese colonial travel writing and pictures, 1683-1895. andrade's take is especially interesting because he started out as a dutch historian, and only later moved to chinese history. and he's a really nice guy to boot.
by wu ming on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 02:54:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I have read Shepherd's book. Great! Andrade's is next on my list, and I've been planning to read Teng's as well.
by Panhu from Wuling on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 11:03:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series