Well I can't really sum all that up in one comment, but I do intend to post a series of follow-ups. I don't have a complete "narrative," and obviously no one yet does, but on its face the official story of 19 suicide hijackers on orders from Bin Laden is at best incomplete and at worst a fabrication, because it doesn't describe the other phenomena (stand down orders, building collapses, put options, molten metal, etc) that weren't addressed by the 9-11 Commission.

Jerome a Paris thinks it is "reasonably uncontroversial" that "the 9-11 Commission was largely incomplete in its investigation". He wants to know "how and why", and he thinks that this is "a lot harder to know for sure".

I do not at all think that it is very hard.

The 9/11 Commission was never meant to be doing the conduct a complete investigation in the first place by its controling masters.

In fact, the 9/11 Commission was never meant to come into  existence at all in the first place!

Just have short look at the history of the commission, and all the little scandals around it...

I mean, every bank robbery is better investigated. More evidence is secured (instead of destroyed in a haste).

The first investigation, by the "9/11 Commission", came about only because a small group of grieving families waged a tenacious battle for it. And they fought against a wall of people who sought to bury the truth about the event -- including, to their amazement, President Bush.

Sally Regenhard (a spokesperson of the "9/11 families" -- she personally lost her son due to the 9/11 crime) sums it up pretty nicely: "The largest structural collapse in World History, the largest loss of life on American soil since the Civil war, and not ONE Governmental or Elected Official wanted to know why and how this happened?"

Look, 40 million $US was spent to investigate Bill Clinton's sex life while Monica Lewinski was around the Oval Office. Only 600.000 $US was spent to investigate the "collapse" of the Twin Towers. The entire 9/11 Commission spent 15 million $US, while on the investigation of Clinton's lies concerning his sex 65 million $US were spent. And you don't think that is because of an "agenda" of the puppet masters? You really think it is because of the incompetence of the puppets?!?

The evidence that the government has covered up and whitewashed what really occurred on 9/11 is overwhelming.

Some more details:

• For example, the former director of the FBI says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission.

• And the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn't bother to tell the American people (free subscription required).

• Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission admitted that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.

• 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only "the first draft" of history.

• 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version ... We didn't have access ...."

• And former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up".

The 9/11 Commission was a fake. It produced an "Omission Report". Shame to anyone who believes they did an honest job! It was first meant to be headed by infamous Henry Kissinger (a man who is well known to be able to "keep secrets") -- only the protest of the 9/11 families then forced Bush to change that role. It finally was headed as the chief investigator by a Professor, Philip D. Zelikow, whose self-confessed expertise is "creation + maintenance of public myths" (!), "shared in common within the relevant political community."

And a myth they tried to create. Successfully so far (as can be seen from the stance of people like robert.feinman), though it now starts to crumble....

Is it any wonder that the "9/11 widows" are not at all satisfied with the results of the first commission, and now call for a new and truly independent investigation into 9/11 ?