This binary thinking really bugs me. There is no "the official version" and there is no single sceptical version. Claims from official sources have changed in the past, see example of air control timeline. Critics of the 9/11 Commission vary greatly in what they criticise and what they accept from others' criticisms (see for example the where are the wings controversy, where some 9/11 truthies think this all is Rumsfeld's spin to discredit truthseekers). In turn there are private debunkers who analyse conspiracy claims on their own, and 9/11 truthies in turn establish different counter-hypotheses.

_{*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.}