Could you demonstrate that superior logic?

Do you mean actors learned to imitate traffic controllers (or traffic controllers learned to act) and have recorded dozens of hours of talk in half a dozen air traffic centers to fake a consistent story of incompetence and chaos? The number of people (and people who aren't leaking, unlike in the rather big and rather real Iraq War conspiracy) part of the 9-11 conspiracy grows with every additional claim.

it would have been strange for its officials, by saying that they had been notified by the FAA earlier than they really had, to open themselves not only to the charge of criminal fraud but also to the suspicion that they had deliberately not intercepted the hijacked airliners.

What spectacular 'logic'. For those not bothering to check the link, the claim concerns the scrambling of the second two, Langley planes. The planes that somehow failed to intercept the plane hitting the Pentagon. As we learnt from the tapes, because they have been sent after the phantom of the first plane to hit the WTC (a phantom arising outside NORAD, when due to lack of confirmation of plane loss from American Airlines, a civilian controller believed it still flies and told NORAD so), and because no one told the pilots what's up, the idiots flew out to sea to their usual training ground. Now, 911Truth can't believe that NORAD would want to cover up chasing phantoms by lying about which plane FAA sent them after.

_{*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.}