European Tribune

Display:
Common currency is when you have a common currency and keep your own.

Single currency is when you get rid of your own.

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Jun 2nd, 2007 at 05:27:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Are you thinking that this is this somehow related to "dollarization" of a country?

------------------------------ Rutherfordian RDRutherford
by Ronald Rutherford (rdrradio1@msn.com) on Sat Jun 2nd, 2007 at 05:34:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm interested in generic clearing mechanisms and "fungibility".

I'm interested in what forms of value (as opposed to the "anti-value" issued by banks) are capable of crossing borders and what forms of value are naturally bound domestically.

I'm interested in how Mahathir put two fingers up to the global financial system - imposing restrictions on the movement of capital out of Malaysia - and thereby saving his currency form the "locusts".

And much more.

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Jun 2nd, 2007 at 06:23:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well I did just happen to have the following PDF on my reading list...
http://www.uta.edu/faculty/crowder/papers/Chapter18.pdf

It has on page 13 (of PDF) a section on Currency Substitution.

------------------------------ Rutherfordian RDRutherford

by Ronald Rutherford (rdrradio1@msn.com) on Sat Jun 2nd, 2007 at 08:33:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The ECU was a common currency, but the problems with "a common currency keeping your own" include 1) the inconvenience and expense of currency exchange; 2) the inefficiency of periodic exchange rate revisions compared to freely floating currencies; 3) the fact that commitments by central banks to keep their exchange rates within certain bands with freely floating currencies makes them predictable and therefore vulnerable in the currency markets.

I suppose one could have the Euro circulating alongside freely-floating national currencies. The value of the Euro could be constructed as a currency index. The system wouldn't be vulnerable to attack on the financial markets, but I think people across Europe would still find it inconvenient to convert back and forth.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jun 3rd, 2007 at 02:15:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
A plague on the Euro, and all deficit-based currencies.

I'm interested in the concept of a new Euro as a "European energy unit": in energy grids across the Baltic and North Seas and across the Mediterranean, both of which already have the initial elements in place.

National currencies?

Simply base them upon property rental values, as John Law envisaged three hundred years ago.

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sun Jun 3rd, 2007 at 04:15:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think the problem with a scheme such as that, is why tie your economic growth based on one segment of the economy. Just as the Gold Standard tied the inflation rate to amount of gold mined and on the market.

As an economy is in transition then GDP per dollar of energy consumption has decreased over time-including in the USA.

But, keep working this through...

------------------------------ Rutherfordian RDRutherford

by Ronald Rutherford (rdrradio1@msn.com) on Sun Jun 3rd, 2007 at 07:36:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series