Display:
As you've noted, this could be broken up ... but this is an amazing product, thank you. Learned quite a bit.

A question / thought:  Impression:  US infrastructure programs (rail/highway) cost more than European (substantially).  Is this true? If true, why?

Anyone seen studies / such on this?

And, by the way, European programs seem of higher quality as well.

Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart. NOW!!!

by a siegel (siegeadATgmailIGNORETHISdotPLEASEcom) on Sun Jul 1st, 2007 at 01:00:58 AM EST
The extreme cost of US projects is a mystery to me, here I hope BruceMcF could shed deeper insights. I can only speculate that the reasons are more extreme versions of what make some projects drawn-out and too expensive here:

  • corrupt relationship between construction companies and city politicians
  • local construction company protectionism (the local firm may not know efficient methods of construction)
  • no experience with commanding big projects
  • boosterism (too much care for flashy appearance, which may be expensive on itself and may require lots of legal work for permits or disputes)

It may be that wages are also a factor (European construction is full of low-wage immigrant workers, including illegal; though maybe that's less so in specialised rail construction). But what I noticed is that even the initial stages of major projects -- e.g. feasibility study, environmental impact and other preliminary studies, detailed planning -- are tendered for much higher sums in the US (up to an order of magnitude difference). I can't fully explain that even with all of the above listed reasons.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Jul 1st, 2007 at 06:14:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I haven't listed what I see as the single biggest cost-overrun cause: delays. Delays for whatever reason, including political decision. Delays mean more spending on workers' pay, rent, interests, paperwork [repeated tenders etc.]; while there is inflation, and potential customers are lost. Also, if politicians might opt to pay less annually, the end result will be a higher total. And also, projects opened unfinished, with parts delayed, often lead to an initial customer dissatisfaction that results in lasting bad publicity. But I'm not sure there is that much of a US-EU/Japan difference in this.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Jul 1st, 2007 at 06:22:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series