Display:
It is neet that technology developed just as "geometrically" as human population until now. But this is not so much a function of human ability to innovate, but a function of resource availability: the techology develops just as fast as we need while this development can be supported by available resourses.

My prediction is an abrupt and painful escalation of environmental predicaments. Many populaces will fail to adapt, or "succeed" in anihilating each other. But on community level, a good portion of them will fare well enough to survive a decade (or two) of utmost hardship. In this sense, I agree with the Oil Drum discussion on social localization. In particular, small communities can handle "tragedies of commons" problems without going into general theoretical discussions.

by das monde on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 at 01:04:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I've only got a brief second before tottering off to bed so this will be superficial.

A couple of days ago you brought-up an interesting point when you commented Climatic Patterns are stable-ish for long periods of time.

that is true when the time period used is based on the fundamental human decision-making time period: (roughly) one second.  If one collapses geologic time such that it approximates human time one sees continents merrily whizzing around, bashing into each other, rebounding, joining, spliting apart, & etc.  

by ATinNM on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 at 01:19:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series