Display:
the WSJ is firmly in the camp you'd expect it to be:


A Brief History of Economic Time

Modern humans first emerged about 100,000 years ago. For the next 99,800 years or so, nothing happened. Well, not quite nothing. There were wars, political intrigue, the invention of agriculture -- but none of that stuff had much effect on the quality of people's lives. Almost everyone lived on the modern equivalent of $400 to $600 a year, just above the subsistence level. True, there were always tiny aristocracies who lived far better, but numerically they were quite insignificant.

Then -- just a couple of hundred years ago, maybe 10 generations -- people started getting richer. And richer and richer still. Per capita income, at least in the West, began to grow at the unprecedented rate of about three quarters of a percent per year. A couple of decades later, the same thing was happening around the world.

Then it got even better. By the 20th century, per capita real incomes, that is, incomes adjusted for inflation, were growing at 1.5% per year, on average, and for the past half century they've been growing at about 2.3%.

(...)

[5 more paragraphs telling us how the economy and prosperity today is great]

(...)

The source of this wealth -- the engine of prosperity -- is ...

Let me interrupt here briefly. You might expect a mention of oil, or coal, or energy more generally, right?

In the WSJ? Nah.


...technological progress. And the engine of technological progress is ideas -- not just the ideas from engineering laboratories, but also ideas like new methods of crop rotation, or just-in-time inventory management.

(...)

Which contribution is more important? By one rough measure -- the profits earned by the innovator -- they're about equal. In the late 1980s, Microsoft earned economic profits of about $600 million a year, while Michael Milken, the inventor of the junk bond, earned an annual income that was just about the same.

Some good ideas even come from economists. Julian Simon came up with the idea of bribing airline passengers to give up their seats on overbooked flights -- and gone were the days when you relied on the luck of the draw to make it to your daughter's wedding. Economists first suggested creating property rights in African elephants, a policy that has given villagers an incentive to harvest at a sustainable rate and drive the poachers away. The result? Villagers have prospered and the elephant population has soared.

Engineers figure out how to harness the power of technology; economists figure out how to harness the power of incentives. Our prosperity relies on both.

Microsoft and Milken. Technology and economists. There you go. The economists that invented infinite growth in a finite resource system. And defy the second law of thermodynamics.

Yippee.

Wealth capture still has a future.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 at 12:44:57 PM EST
Modern humans first emerged about 100,000 years ago. For the next 99,800 years or so, nothing happened. Well, not quite nothing. There were wars, political intrigue, the invention of agriculture -- but none of that stuff had much effect on the quality of people's lives. Almost everyone lived on the modern equivalent of $400 to $600 a year, just above the subsistence level. True, there were always tiny aristocracies who lived far better, but numerically they were quite insignificant.

WTF?

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 at 12:46:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
WTF is probably the right abbreviation for that newspaper...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 at 01:12:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This is what hostorical world population (the best proxy we have for world GDP for the far past, especially accepting the WTF's claim that the standard of living was essentially constant before 1800) looks like. The dashed line is the watershed before which "nothing happened".


Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 at 01:17:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
wow, I didn't know you could run cars and generators on Ideas.

the WSJ now officially belongs on the supermarket newsstand next to the National Enquirer.

[if any non-USians don't get that reference, the Nat Enq is a nearly-self-satirising tabloid specialising in Elvis sitings, two-headed babies, images of Christ seen in Martian craters, etc]

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 at 03:47:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I find the idea that there was no technological progress to speak of before 1800 even more ludicrous.

Is this what they teach people in Economics 101?

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 at 04:01:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have often noticed this "chronological hubris" in undereducated modern people;  they think there was no technology, no cleverness, no machinery, no innovation, no sophistication in human history before their pet epoch.

nixtamalisation of corn, for example, a pretty darned sophisticated method of processing grains, should figure right up there with crop rotation and the wheel, but since it was invented in the "dawn of history" by "illiterate savages" it doesn't count.  it always makes my skin crawl when I hear some average schmo who can't tell one plant from another call "illiterate" some person from, say, 1000 years back who could identify thousands of plant species on sight and know all their alimentary and medicinal properties.

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 at 04:24:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by Laurent GUERBY on Sat Jun 9th, 2007 at 05:05:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
45 comments

Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
32 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9
1 comment

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
9 comments

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
32 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
45 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9
1 comment

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
9 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
48 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series