The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
One person offers a share of a known quantity, say, $100, to a second. The second person knows that they can accept or reject the offer. If player 2 accepts, both receive the reward in the agreed proportion. If the second player rejects the offer, both receive nothing.
Just because I know you love graphs...
From Gamelab, Harvard:
Number of players: 30 (15 games)
Mean proposal: 39 ± 10.7
Distribution of proposals:
The vast majority (73%) offers 40 or 50 points.
Surprisingly one offer of 40 is rejected
The rational strategy is to offer 1 point, and to accept everything. In reality, offers below 30% get mostly rejected. In a vast majority of studies conducted with different incentives in different countries, some 60-80% of proposers offer between 40% and 50% of the total sum, and only 3% of proposers offer less than 20%. Conversely, some 50% of responders reject offers below 30% of the total.
The 'rational', material, utility-maximising response for the proposee is to accept anything offered, even one unit out of 100.
People don't. There appears to be a payoff in depriving the maker of an unfair offer of his/her share, even at cost to oneself.
by melo - Jan 23 4 comments
by gmoke - Jan 15 5 comments
by DoDo - Jan 20 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 16 104 comments
by ChrisCook - Jan 1 65 comments
by afew - Jan 5 44 comments
by rifek - Jan 5 9 comments
by DoDo - Jan 2 5 comments
by afew - Jan 251 comment
by melo - Jan 234 comments
by DoDo - Jan 204 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 16104 comments
by gmoke - Jan 155 comments
by afew - Jan 544 comments
by rifek - Jan 59 comments
by DoDo - Jan 25 comments
by ChrisCook - Jan 165 comments
by melo - Dec 316 comments
by Metatone - Dec 3129 comments
by rz - Dec 2956 comments
by A swedish kind of death - Dec 2755 comments
by das monde - Dec 2726 comments