I interpreted the original comment by Fran as petty and more concerned with what she perceived as the shortfall of the diary than the diary itself and deserved a reply.
That may be the case, and that may be ok, but when you received several responses telling you that your interpretation was probably too harsh on Fran, you chose to, again, react, haughtily. It is the second reaction, and your unwillingness to acknowledge the very explicit response of the community (4 unambiguous responses to your comment on the slowest day of the week) that made me react.
We can all have different interpretations of things, and that happens a lot here on a site where not everybody is a native English-language speaker and uses the right expression each time. But we should always be ready to give the benefit of the doubt to others. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
However, in this case, you got messages from many people, all telling you the same thing. I know it is hard to acknowledge that one overreacted, but this is something that we do on ET, and that we appreciate - and which contributes to respectful dialogue.
I've tried to acknowledge your points in various comments. I'm sorry you won't see it. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
Majority doesn't rule one's thoughts.
You have been incredibly arrogant and rude and have dismissed attempts to explain and discuss with you by yet more arrogance.
There's clearly something you don't get about this place. When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
So go ahead: When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
