Display:
I do, by the way, believe that Iran will not stop at development of a peaceful nuclear capability and fully intends to develop weapons.

Is a belief enough to make a consideration of armed preventive war not mad?

To what end, no one can be certain, but it is quite possible that it will do so for leverage against Israel and the US.  But no one wins in a nuclear war

Have you considered deterrence? The exact same reason most nuclear states insist on their arsenal?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Jul 24th, 2007 at 04:32:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, I would characterize persons who would seriously consider going to war over Iran's nuclear ambitions as exceptionally foolish or maybe strongly motivated by something other than what most sane people would consider reasonable cause. But I wouldn't necessarily characterize them as mad. Look at the Iraq war.  Was it the result of ignorance coupled with greed, foolish misadventure, revenge, insanity, misplaced concerns over national security, or a combination of these things?  I haven't quite made up my mind, as some have here, but I lean these days towards a combination of these things that were present in varying degrees in those who argued for war.

I guess you could say that "leverage" includes deterrence, although it will be a long long time before Iran's capabilities would be seen as constituting a credible deterrence.

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears

by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Tue Jul 24th, 2007 at 11:03:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series