European Tribune

Display:
Just to make one thing clear: you were asked to be more moderate. You were not "censored" and you were not threatened with anything at all, least of all banning. No one has ever been banned from ET. No one. Why on earth would you be?

So if you're still determined to pump the issue up, that's your decision.

I tried to welcome you back to commenting, but if you want to be silly, go ahead.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jul 4th, 2007 at 12:58:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
 I made what I felt was a mildly satirical comment as a solution to the bind that an incoming Democratic President would be in over the composition of the USSC. Emphasis on mild.

Indeed, the only way to be more moderate was not to say anything. And yet the attack of the vapours still occured. Is American politics occuring on a rarified plane where such grubby considerations  are unconscionable ? Not so far as I've seen in the last couple of days, yet apparently we aren't allowed to suggest such things. I just don't see why it was wrong and, silly or no, it's undermined my confidence to comment. I'd love to come back but I really need to know why it was wrong.

I didn't know that nobody had been banned, but as we have discussed elsewhere, there is a difference between intention and perception. So I was not threatened with banning, but that's not how it seemed.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 4th, 2007 at 01:15:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Jul 4th, 2007 at 05:20:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series