GDP (purchasing power parity):
GWP (gross world product): $65.95 trillion (2006 est.)

GDP (official exchange rate):
$46.76 trillion (2006 est.)

Exports:
$12.44 trillion f.o.b. (2004 est.)

Imports:
$12.09 trillion f.o.b. (2004 est.)

As to wheter or not these numbers are comparable with those previously provided in this thread, I am not sure. Definitions within economics seams to be a tricky matter.

Oil imports $360B/month
Imports $190B/month
GDP $417B/month

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

We know that the US pays $ for oil, that is her currency of course. The point at issue relates to other peoples' use of the "petrodollar", and I believe that many commentators - not to mention many conspiracy theorists - are labouring under a misapprehension as to the importance of the $ for denominating oil prices.

That having been said, an unHoly Trinity of:

(a) US massive over consumption of oil;
(b) continuing growth of non-US global oil demand; and
(c) the fact of a maximum level of global oil production (whether it is called a "peak" or a "plateau" is semantics);

will IMHO lead to a breakdown (slow motion crash if we are lucky), in the current global financial system and arising out of a discontinuity in the Dollar/Oil relationship. Within 2 to 5 years, I believe.

I don't think that the charts you have kindly supplied are inconsistent with that thesis.