But I get the impression you think certain qualities, traits, ideas, are either 1) a result of one's gender or 2) have genders of their own. I don't know where I stand on that. I think that often men and women experience the world differently, but often as a result of social norms. So do we assign ways of seeing the world a gender because we think it might be dangerous for men to stray from their day jobs or for women to have too much power? Do we assign them genders as a way of judging them (rational v. irrational)? Last time I checked, men and women had the same capacity for rational thought and for irrational feeling. They are just encouraged to express them differently. Still, the day my brother stops falling madly in love with every girl he meets and calling me at 3 am to talk about it, and the day my girlfriend gives up engineering as her profession and political science as her hobby, I'll be a bit more open to the idea that a person's perspective is implicitly gender-based. "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
My belief system agrees with the yin-yang symbology that the uniting of male and female is what is needed to make the perfect homeostatic world. I am not sure that it depends in implicity, but it is surely the best fit with evolutionary principles. You can't be me, I'm taken
Through it all, my way of seeing the world did not change. Fortunately, medicine did. "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
i was taught that was the definition of death!
from free growth and chaotic change emerges relative order.
absolute order would be death too. ~"When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate." Karl Jung~
